ipbase Alternative: 150K Requests for $2.50 and 3× the Capacity
Get about 150K monthly requests for $2.50 instead of 65K for $9.99, with standard connection fields, field filtering, and optional browser and device context.
More Room for Production Workloads
3× the Monthly Request Capacity
IPWho’s $10 plan includes up to 7.5M monthly requests, compared with ipbase Large at 2.5M.
About 400× More Free Requests
IPWho provides about 60K free requests per month, compared with ipbase at 150 requests per month.
Standard Connection Context
Return ASN, ISP, organization, domain, and connection type in the standard IP lookup response.
Pricing comparison
Compare the plans you would actually use, not only the entry tier.
| Service Plan | ipbase | IPWho.org |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | $0 | $0 |
| First paid plan | $9.99/month | $2.50/month |
| High-volume plan | $89.99/month | $10/month |
| Unlimited plan | Custom | $69/month |
Pricing based on official ipbase documentation as of April 8, 2026: https://ipbase.com/pricing
Updated: April 8, 2026
Why switch
Switch from ipbase when production value and workflow fit matter.
- ✓You need about 150K monthly requests at a lower entry price.
- ✓You want up to 7.5M monthly requests at the $10 plan level.
- ✓You need field filtering and user-agent context.
- ✓You want all core fields available without moving through higher tiers.
When not to switch
Stay with ipbase when its specific strengths are central to your workflow.
- –You rely on ipbase's SDKs, dashboard, or exact developer workflow.
- –Its current plan already covers your request volume and fields.
- –Migration and field remapping would cost more than the expected savings.
Production-safe migration
How to compare ipbase and IPWho before switching
- 1Identify your current monthly request volume, required fields, and response format.
- 2Choose the IPWho plan that matches the production volume you expect.
- 3Create an IPWho API key and test both APIs with the same sample IP addresses.
- 4Map field names, authentication, errors, and response-format differences in staging.
- 5Validate bulk lookup, field filtering, and any security or connection fields your application uses.
- 6Move production traffic gradually and monitor response differences.
ipbase alternative FAQ
Common questions before switching from ipbase
Is IPWho a good ipbase alternative for production workloads?
IPWho is a strong fit when lower entry pricing, larger request capacity, field filtering, and a unified response matter most.
How does the first paid level compare?
The page compares IPWho at $2.50 for about 150K monthly requests with ipbase Small at $9.99 for 65K requests.
When should I stay with ipbase?
Stay if its SDKs, dashboard, exact response behavior, or existing integration are more valuable than changing providers.
Does IPWho include ASN and connection data in the standard response?
Yes. The standard IPWho response can include ASN, ISP, organization, domain, and connection type alongside location data.
Does IPWho support field filtering and browser/device detection?
Yes. You can filter the returned fields and optionally supply a user agent to receive browser, operating-system, device, engine, and CPU context.
Performance and Latency vs ipbase.com
ipbase.com provides a hosted API with standard geolocation capabilities and developer tooling.
IPWho.org is designed for consistent performance across globally distributed infrastructure.
ipbase.com Limitations
- ✕Limited free plan
- ✕Feature access depends on plan
- ✕Scaling requires higher tiers
IPWho Features
- ✓Request-based usage
- ✓Consistent feature availability
- ✓Structured API responses
- ✓Bulk lookup and filtering
| Location | ipbase.com | IPWho.org |
|---|---|---|
| Frankfurt, DE | 50 ms | 49 ms |
| Ashburn, VA, USA | 159 ms | 30 ms |
| Singapore, SG | 209 ms | 37 ms |
| Mumbai, IN | 319 ms | 30 ms |
| Los Angeles, CA, USA | 216 ms | 39 ms |
Note: Measurement figures represent median values from a sample of HTTP synthetic request measurements per city, executed via GlobalPing datacenter network probes on April 8, 2026.
Latency figures can be independently verified via the GlobalPing network.
Verify vs ipbase.com ↗Comparison Methodology
Pricing uses each provider’s published plan labels, prices, and request allowances. Latency figures are city-level median measurements from the GlobalPing network, shown as directional testing data rather than a production SLA.