Use case

IP Geolocation API for Fraud Prevention & Risk Scoring

Turn a raw IP into risk signals — network type, location mismatches, anonymiser flags, and impossible travel — in one sub-50ms lookup.

Fraud teams don't need another verdict engine — they need signals. One IP lookup tells you whether a request comes from a residential ISP or a datacentre, whether its location matches the billing address, and whether it's hiding behind a VPN or Tor. Feed those into the risk stack you already run.


Who uses it

The teams that lean on this most, in rough order of how often we see it.

The signals it uses

Every one ships in the standard response — no add-ons, no tiers.

connection (ASN / org / type) Tell residential from hosting, cloud, and datacentre traffic — the single strongest fraud signal
country / region / city Compare against billing address, shipping, and stated location
security (isVpn / isTor / isThreat) Basic anonymiser and known-threat flags to feed risk rules
latitude / longitude Distance and impossible-travel checks between sessions
is_in_eu Jurisdiction context for sanctions and regional risk policy

How different teams put it to work

The same signals, applied to the fraud each industry actually sees.

Fintech

Score sign-ups, logins, and payments

Example

New account → 185.220.x.x · security.isTor: true

Tor exit + hosting ASN → high-risk score, step-up to manual review

See more Fintech use cases →
E-commerce

Catch billing / location mismatches at checkout

Example

Billing: US · IP country: NG · ASN: hosting provider

country mismatch + datacentre origin → flag for review, don't auto-decline

See more E-commerce use cases →
SaaS

Spot account-takeover with impossible travel

Example

Session A: Berlin → Session B: Lagos (4 min)

impossible travel → raise anomaly, trigger re-auth

See more SaaS use cases →

Common questions

Can IP geolocation block fraud on its own?

No — and it shouldn't. It supplies signals, not verdicts. The strongest is network type: a request from a hosting or datacentre ASN behaves very differently from a residential one. Combine that with country, anonymiser flags, and impossible-travel checks, then feed the result into your existing risk engine alongside device and behavioural signals.

What's the single most useful fraud signal in the response?

Connection type and ASN. Most automated fraud and bot traffic originates from hosting, cloud, or datacentre networks rather than residential ISPs. Flagging datacentre origin on a consumer sign-up or checkout is one of the highest-leverage, lowest-false-positive rules you can add.

Won't VPN and proxy users get wrongly blocked?

That's why these are signals, not auto-declines. Plenty of legitimate users browse via VPN. Use the flags to raise risk scores or trigger step-up verification, not to hard-block — and always let a real customer prove themselves through your normal flow.

How fast is it, and does it need a permission prompt?

It resolves server-side from the request IP with a median response under 50ms and needs no browser permission prompt — so it fits inline in a sign-up, login, or checkout flow without adding friction.

Add a risk signal in one request

Free tier: 2,000 lookups/day, no card. Paid plans from $2.50/month. Bulk endpoint available for scoring events at scale.