IPLocate Alternative: 94% Lower Cost at 2M Monthly Requests
IPLocate is $249/month for 2,000,000 requests/month. IPWho Startup is $14/month for 250K requests/day: approximately 7.5M requests using an approximate 30-day normalization, $235 less per month, and approximately 3.75× the 30-day request capacity.
The 2M-Request Cost and Capacity Difference
Save $235 Each Month
IPLocate is $249/month at 2,000,000 requests/month. IPWho Startup is $14/month, a $235 monthly difference and an approximately 94% cost reduction.
Approximately 3.75× the 30-Day Capacity
An approximate 30-day normalization converts IPWho Startup's 250K requests/day to approximately 7.5M requests over 30 days, compared with IPLocate's 2M monthly requests.
Monthly Billing on Both Sides
The primary comparison uses IPLocate at $249/month and IPWho Startup at $14/month. Both figures are monthly subscription prices.
IPLocate vs IPWho Pricing
Compare the published plan prices and request allowances from each provider.
| Service Plan | IPLocate | IPWho.org |
|---|---|---|
| Free account | $0 | Free - $0 |
| Monthly API entry | $25/month | Launch - $3/month |
| 300K monthly plan | $49/month | Startup - $14/month |
| 1M monthly plan | $149/month | Startup - $14/month |
| 2M monthly plan | $249/month | Startup - $14/month |
| Custom | Contact sales | Enterprise - $99/month |
Research date: August 2026. Daily and monthly allowances are shown as published. The page only normalizes them where the primary comparison explicitly says so.
Quick decision proof
Compare the monthly price, request capacity, and workflow fit.
The strongest managed-API proof is the $235 monthly saving at the 2M-request point. Downloadable databases and the 1,000-IP batch workflow remain valid IPLocate considerations for teams that require them.
| Decision point | IPLocate | IPWho |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly subscription price | $249/month | $14/month for Startup |
| Published request allowance | 2,000,000 requests/month | 250,000 requests/day |
| Approximate 30-day normalization | 2,000,000 monthly requests | Approximately 7.5M requests over 30 days using an approximate 30-day normalization |
| Monthly price difference | $249/month baseline | $235 less per month, or approximately 94% lower |
| 30-day request capacity | 2M monthly requests | Approximately 3.75× the capacity using the approximate 30-day normalization |
| Workflow fit | Managed API, downloadable databases, and batches of up to 1,000 IPs | Managed hosted API with bulk lookup |
Why switch
Switch from IPLocate when production value and workflow fit matter.
- ✓You need a 2M-request workload at an approximately 94% lower monthly cost.
- ✓You want to save $235 each month at the primary comparison point.
- ✓You want approximately 3.75 times the 30-day request capacity using the approximate 30-day normalization.
- ✓You are choosing a managed hosted API and do not require a downloadable database workflow.
- ✓You want a daily published allowance that can cover growth beyond 2M requests in an approximate 30-day period.
When not to switch
Stay with IPLocate when its specific strengths are central to your workflow.
- –Your deployment requires IPLocate's downloadable databases.
- –Its workflow for batches of up to 1,000 IPs is already central to your operation.
- –Your existing IPLocate response mapping and contract meet your requirements, and migration would not justify the saving.
Production-safe migration
How to compare IPLocate and IPWho before switching
- 1List the IPLocate response fields and workflows your application uses.
- 2Separate managed API requirements from downloadable database requirements.
- 3Test the same IP addresses in both services and map required fields.
- 4Validate authentication, errors, missing values, bulk behavior, and quota handling in staging.
- 5Move production traffic gradually after the response mapping and capacity plan are approved.
IPLocate alternative FAQ
Common questions before switching from IPLocate
How much less does IPWho cost at 2M monthly requests?
IPLocate is $249/month for 2,000,000 requests/month, while IPWho Startup is $14/month. The difference is $235 per month.
How is the approximately 94% cost reduction calculated?
Subtracting $14 from $249 gives a $235 monthly difference. Dividing $235 by $249 gives approximately 94.4%, which is stated as approximately 94% lower monthly cost.
How is IPWho's 30-day request capacity calculated?
IPWho Startup publishes 250,000 requests/day. Using an approximate 30-day normalization, that is approximately 7.5M requests over 30 days.
Why is the capacity comparison approximately 3.75 times?
The approximate 30-day normalization gives IPWho approximately 7.5M requests over 30 days. Dividing that by IPLocate's 2M monthly requests gives approximately 3.75 times the 30-day request capacity.
When might IPLocate still fit better?
IPLocate may fit a team whose requirements center on downloadable databases or its workflow for batches of up to 1,000 IPs. This page focuses on managed hosted API buyers.
Does this comparison mix monthly and annual billing?
No. The primary comparison uses IPLocate at $249/month and IPWho Startup at $14/month, so it is monthly billing compared with monthly billing.
Comparison Methodology
Research date: August 2026. The comparison uses monthly subscription prices of $249 for IPLocate and $14 for IPWho Startup. The $235 difference divided by $249 is approximately 94.4%, rounded to approximately 94%. IPWho publishes 250,000 requests/day; multiplying that allowance by 30 produces approximately 7.5M requests using an approximate 30-day normalization. Dividing approximately 7.5M by 2M gives approximately 3.75× the 30-day request capacity. Workflow notes are included as fit considerations, not as feature deficiencies. Validate fields, quotas, and contract terms before a production migration.